A bitter High Court dispute has damaged out between possible neighbours in excess of the development of a wall at a coastal web-site inside a north Dublin suburb, a scenario which includes captivated countrywide consideration next an Irish Times report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres on the proposed spouse and children house at Sutton Strand, the place allegations of scheduling breaches, environmental concerns, and extended-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled to the courts. The Irish Periods posting about René Collier and also the Irish Instances write-up about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what started as a neighborhood disagreement has developed into a extremely publicised legal struggle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing over construction works at the site on Dublin Road, Sutton, where Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a physician and a corporation director respectively, seek to make their spouse and children dwelling. The situation is becoming emblematic of wider disputes together Ireland’s coastline, exactly where improvement pressures collide with environmental protections and the sensitivities of founded inhabitants. According to the Irish Situations report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall staying created by their prospective neighbours goes further than the boundaries permitted beneath preparing authorization.
René Collier and Paul Feely, the two people of Dublin Street, assert that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the phrases in their organizing authorization by building a wall further than the boundaries of their web-site, leading to an encroachment over a Unique Place of Conservation. The SAC designation is central for the dispute, therefore locations are subject matter to strict controls underneath European and Irish environmental regulation. Within their courtroom filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even insignificant encroachments could have lasting ecological penalties, specifically in a very delicate coastal surroundings for instance Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They're in breach of their arranging authorization, and say the wall, which is partially developed, is in the correct position. Their legal crew has characterised the motion being an make an effort to delay or frustrate a lawful development. The couple accuse litigants of trying to get to halt homebuilding as a way to protect their look at, an allegation that's been recurring in courtroom and referenced in coverage of the case. This accusation goes to the heart of many coastal planning disputes, exactly where views of The ocean are both of those highly prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Times report naming René Collier and Paul Feely explained extraordinary initiatives via the plaintiffs to doc the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded by ocean in storm to photograph the location, In keeping with sworn proof referenced while in the Irish Instances. In one account, Rene Collier waded through waist-higher h2o all through a storm to photograph the internet site Irish Periods, an image which includes due to the fact turn into emblematic in the depth on the dispute. These actions weren't merely symbolic; they were being intended to Assemble visual proof in the wall’s position relative to tidal traces and guarded land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the location in the sea Irish Situations documented, describing how The 2 Guys entered the h2o in the course of severe weather conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading as a result of storm water to photograph the internet site became One of the more striking descriptions to emerge from courtroom reporting. The Irish Times report about accountant Paul Feely pointed out that this sort of steps were being cited to show the plaintiffs’ belief the wall prolonged into a region affected by tidal movement, strengthening their argument that the SAC was currently being encroached on.
The events at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 had been lined intimately via the countrywide push. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Times 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Instances January 27 2026 grew to become broadly searched phrases as viewers sought to be familiar with the background and implications of the situation. On that day, the High Court read further more submissions on regardless of whether interim orders must be granted to halt development pending a complete hearing. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a crucial second inside the legal timeline.
In the Main of your dispute is usually a disagreement over boundaries, planning compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely manage which the wall, as created, goes over and above what Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the site from the sea Irish Times was accepted and intrudes into guarded land. They argue that this is not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by job, has long been referred to as meticulous in his examination of planning files, maps, and situations attached into the permission.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have both pressured that their action is enthusiastic by problem for environmental security and adherence to arranging law. They reject statements that the case is about preserving A non-public see, insisting in its place that it is about making sure that growth at Sutton Strand respects lawful and ecological limitations. In affidavits, they may have described their extensive-standing connection to the world and their consciousness of its environmental sensitivity.
On one other side, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed on their own as a pair merely looking to develop a spouse and children house in accordance While using the law. They deny that the wall encroaches over a Distinctive Region of Conservation and say that each one is effective happen to be completed based upon professional suggestions and accredited designs. Their lawyers have argued that the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and that the dramatic actions of René Collier and Paul Feely, such as getting into the sea for the duration of a storm, will not alter the fundamental specifics.
The situation has also elevated broader questions about how organizing disputes are settled in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court dispute more than building of wall at coastal website is now a shorthand description for any circumstance that a lot of observers see as more and more typical. As sea ranges increase and coastal erosion intensifies, the exact delineation amongst private land, general public foreshore, and guarded habitats has started to become a lot more contentious.
The Irish Occasions article about René Collier pointed out the businessman had Beforehand been involved with nearby advocacy on planning and environmental challenges, however not at this scale. Meanwhile, the Irish Periods report about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how people from pretty diverse Expert backgrounds can discover themselves aligned in these types of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some studies spell their names, have become synonymous Along with the Sutton Strand case.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the location in the sea Irish Moments protection emphasised, underlining the unusual lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded by midsection-large drinking water during a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Situations and René Collier waded via waistline-superior water in the course of a storm to photograph the location Irish Situations are phrases that appeared frequently in coverage, reflecting equally the Actual physical truth of the coastline and also the symbolic character on the act. For supporters with the plaintiffs, these steps shown motivation; for critics, they illustrated whatever they see being an abnormal tactic.
Given that the High Court proceedings continue, the result continues to be unsure. The courtroom ought to ascertain whether or not the wall as designed complies with setting up authorization and no matter if any encroachment right into a Particular Location of Conservation has occurred. The legal arguments are complex, involving interpretation of maps, tidal details, and scheduling ailments. Still the human factor remains central: neighbours who must Are living together with each other long once the authorized costs have been paid out.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing above construction will work at the positioning on Dublin Road, Sutton, though the implications of the case increase over and above that address. For planners, developers, and people alike, the dispute serves being a reminder of the importance of clarity in scheduling permissions and sensitivity in coastal advancement. Additionally, it underscores how promptly a local disagreement can escalate when elementary issues for instance environmental protection and house legal rights are perceived to become at stake.
Meanwhile, Sutton Strand continues to be a place of normal beauty and contested boundaries. The wall on the centre with the dispute stands partially developed, a Bodily manifestation of unresolved lawful questions. No matter whether it will eventually ultimately be altered, taken out, or concluded as prepared will count on the court’s findings. Until finally then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their versions will probable continue on to look in headlines, joined indelibly to one of the most closely viewed planning disputes in north Dublin in recent years.